<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BW Loves a Trend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.associationinc.com/534/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.associationinc.com/534</link>
	<description>The business of associations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:16:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff De Cagna</title>
		<link>http://www.associationinc.com/534/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff De Cagna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://associationblog.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Kevin, thanks for the mention of my podcast and the article that Jamie and I wrote. Both are very much appreciated.

I&#039;m assuming that your point about the detail with which I describe my podcasts refers to the show notes that I publish on my blog. I do this so that people have a sense of the show&#039;s contents and order before then listen. It also allows me to publish relevant links that I mentioned during the show.

As for your quote from BW, I don&#039;t claim to have &quot;the technical expertise of radio vets,&quot; and I&#039;m doing just fine without it. If so-called radio vets were meeting the needs of listeners, podcasting might never have happened. Podcasting is a do-it-yourself medium that lives in the Long Tail. The issue isn&#039;t how many you can whip through in a short time. Podcasting is about expressing yourself freely, without the powers that be controlling or censoring the content. If your podcast is relevant and worth listening to, who cares how long it lasts?

You&#039;d be surprised how &quot;shocking&quot; our views on strategic planning are to some people in the association community. Glad you&#039;re with us...and we look forward to your comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, thanks for the mention of my podcast and the article that Jamie and I wrote. Both are very much appreciated.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming that your point about the detail with which I describe my podcasts refers to the show notes that I publish on my blog. I do this so that people have a sense of the show&#8217;s contents and order before then listen. It also allows me to publish relevant links that I mentioned during the show.</p>
<p>As for your quote from BW, I don&#8217;t claim to have &#8220;the technical expertise of radio vets,&#8221; and I&#8217;m doing just fine without it. If so-called radio vets were meeting the needs of listeners, podcasting might never have happened. Podcasting is a do-it-yourself medium that lives in the Long Tail. The issue isn&#8217;t how many you can whip through in a short time. Podcasting is about expressing yourself freely, without the powers that be controlling or censoring the content. If your podcast is relevant and worth listening to, who cares how long it lasts?</p>
<p>You&#8217;d be surprised how &#8220;shocking&#8221; our views on strategic planning are to some people in the association community. Glad you&#8217;re with us&#8230;and we look forward to your comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
