Accept or reject? My favorite is #5. Power to the Lizard People!
Fun with Ballots
Previous post: Now You Can Watch "Benson" Reruns on the Big Screen
Next post: Choices, Choices …
The business of associations
Recent Comments
- Lisa Junker said, "Your impression is right! They're a ton of fun to work on (although it's also great when other ..."
- Alice Martin said, "I couldn't have said it better. Judith's way with words and her depth of association knowledge make ..."
- Lisa Junker said, "I agree--it's a great post! I'm really grateful to Cindy Butts for linking to Judith's blog--I don ..."
- Kevin said, "Sarah, thanks for the comment! To use another terribly jargon-y word, what you describe is not ..."
- Sarah Lawler said, "I disagree with Kevin's point that "'monetization' is a ridiculous concept because it makes it seem ..."
- Wes Trochlil said, "Perhaps wishful thinking on the part of MSNBC? ..."
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Paper ballots have always posed problems in counting. There is too great a liklihood that ballots will be marked incorrectly or illegally.
Voting machines are better for voters but are very susceptible to election fraud in the reading and recording of votes.
Video screens are better (that’s how I voted) but the devices sometimes don’t function and election judges don’t always know how to work them. Also, some elderly and disabled people can’t discern images on the screen.
Whatever method is used, voting should ALWAYS be in person at a polling place where voter identity can be verified and multiple voting prevented.