I’m not sure that I agree that this is a useful way to track comparative readership, but it’s interesting nonetheless. And a reminder that I need to start posting regularly again!
…and Back to Work
Previous post: Back on Mac
Next post: Texting
The business of associations
Recent Comments
- Ellen said, "Great post and comments! I've been watching various discussions of what's happening in the ..."
- David Gammel said, "I heard a quote years ago (sorry can't remember who said it!) that an association is not a single ..."
- Joe Rominiecki said, "I suppose it's my turn to respond here, as I think I'm partly responsible (at fault?) for getting ..."
- Kevin said, "@Mark - Excellent comment, thanks for leaving it. Great point that one of the primary differences ..."
- Maddie Grant said, "Ha - Kevin I knew you wouldn't disappoint. I was waiting for someone to say "hold on a minute" and ..."
- Mark Athitakis said, "Eeep! I meant to say that "the association model has enough revenue streams in it that (most) don’t ..."
{ 2 comments }
Well I will say it is a defacto measurement, but it gives people an idea. The only other real way to get a handle on number of subscribers is Feedburner and naturally that isn’t public information.
Are you going to be at ASAE?
Kevin, glad you’re back! The other Clumpers and I miss you when you’re gone. ;>)
Comments on this entry are closed.